One customer, different records
The storefront has a buyer, ERP has a trading account and CRM has a company. Unclear matching creates duplicate records and incomplete context.
Ecommerce, ERP and CRM integration
Connect your storefront, ERP and CRM around the customer and the order. Give each handoff a clear record, a defined direction and an accountable owner.
Start with one useful workflow. Connect the systems it needs.
Customer account · submitted order
Accepted order · fulfilment status
Account context · next customer action
Where the journey breaks
A sale can pass through several applications and teams. The friction usually sits between them: an unmatched account, an unconfirmed order or a status nobody can explain.
The storefront has a buyer, ERP has a trading account and CRM has a company. Unclear matching creates duplicate records and incomplete context.
A checkout confirmation does not always mean the operational system accepted the order. Teams need to distinguish submitted, accepted and rejected.
Sales and service teams search elsewhere for fulfilment updates while the customer sees an older version of events.
Follow the handoffs
Trace a representative order across the systems in scope. Agree what triggers each exchange, what the receiving system must confirm and how the team checks the result.
Link the buyer, company and trading account using agreed identifiers. Define whether a new account is created, matched or sent for review.
Transfer the agreed lines, quantities, prices, addresses and references. Return the receiving system’s order reference or a useful rejection reason.
Map the agreed fulfilment milestones to the customer-facing and CRM views. Define how partial shipments, changes and cancellations are represented.
Make selected account, order and status information available for a customer conversation, with clear permissions and a named next owner.
Record the reason, preserve the original reference and route it to an agreed owner. Correct the cause, retry safely and check that source and destination agree.
Choose the exchanges
The project scope defines the records, fields and changes that move. A connection between two applications does not mean every object or action is included.
Account IDs, company relationships, contacts and agreed addresses. Decide who owns each field and which changes may flow back.
Example events: account approved, company updated, contact linked.Item codes, selling units, agreed customer prices and the stock or availability view used in commerce. Define freshness and missing-data behavior.
Example events: product updated, price changed, stock snapshot received.Order references, lines, quantities, totals, delivery details and the lifecycle changes supported by the receiving system.
Example events: order submitted, accepted, rejected, amended or dispatched.Selected account and order facts in CRM, including source references and the status your team needs for the next conversation.
Example events: order status changed, account linked, exception assigned.Each exchange needs a source, a destination, an owner, a trigger and an acceptance check. API access, supported events, data quality and vendor limits determine the implementation approach.
The rules between systems
Reliable integration is more than field mapping. Agree how the workflow behaves when data changes, a request repeats or an application is temporarily unavailable.
Choose the authoritative system for each field, define matching keys and document permitted update directions. Avoid circular updates and automatic merges where identity is uncertain.
Define how repeated requests are recognized, when retries are safe and how late events are handled. The goal is one intended business result even when delivery is attempted again.
Compare agreed source and destination records, identify missing or inconsistent results and assign exception review. Document who investigates and how a correction is confirmed.
Transfer timing, retry limits, logging, retention and operational support are scoped explicitly. Real-time updates and unattended processing depend on the systems and workflow; they are not assumed for every connection.
From discovery to release
Start with the handoff that creates the most repeated work or uncertainty. Build a defined first release before adding more objects, teams or lifecycle events.
Follow an account and an order through the current process. Confirm ownership, interface access, dependencies and the first useful scope.
Agree field mappings, triggers, validation and exception handling. Implement the selected connections and documented transformations.
Check matching, successful transfers, duplicate requests, rejected records and interrupted handoffs against agreed acceptance criteria.
Prepare a controlled rollout, reconciliation checks and recovery steps. Assign operational responsibilities and agree post-launch support.
Before we scope
Start with a process description and anonymized examples. Arrange a suitable channel before sharing customer records or confidential commercial data.
The right starting point
This service focuses on the complete customer and order handoff across commerce, ERP and CRM. The first release can involve just two of those systems.
Your applications broadly do their jobs, but accounts, orders or status updates become disconnected between them. You need shared identifiers, clear lifecycle rules and a tested path for the next team to act.
Conflicting data ownership, unreliable source records or unavailable interfaces can block useful integration. Identify those constraints during discovery rather than assuming another connection will solve them.
Before you begin
Practical answers for planning your first connected workflow.
Talk through your requirementsThis service starts with the customer journey across commerce, ERP and CRM: account matching, order handoffs and useful sales or service context. ERP integration starts with the ERP’s operational boundary, such as stock, finance or back-office processes. A project may involve both; the scope makes the responsibilities clear.
No. Start with the systems needed for the immediate workflow, such as commerce and ERP. A CRM connection can follow separately, with shared identifiers, data ownership and other dependencies documented from the start.
The assessment starts with what you already use. We review the relevant interfaces, mappings and failure points before proposing changes. Existing connections may be retained, adjusted or replaced within an agreed scope; compatibility depends on the actual versions, configuration and access available.
We define account matching keys, a review path for uncertain identities and rules for recognizing repeated order requests. Existing duplicate data may need a separate cleanup step. Automatic merging is not assumed, and retry behavior is tested against the agreed duplicate-handling rules.
No. Event-driven, scheduled and file-based exchanges are assessed against the business need and the interfaces available. Timing, acceptable data age and recovery behavior are agreed per workflow. Faster updates are useful only when the systems can support them reliably.
The project defines what is logged, which failures may retry, which need review and who owns the next action. Testing covers representative failures and recovery. Cost, timing, post-launch support and any service commitments are agreed in the project scope; ongoing managed support is not automatically included.
Your next connected workflow
Tell us which systems you use, where the journey breaks and what the next team needs to know. An anonymized example is enough to start the conversation.
support@twinorbits.com